Iraq and al-Qaeda

Facts are mean little boogers. With everyone rushing forward to say that Iraq was not complicit in the 9/11 attacks and was not in cahoots with al Qaeda, something rings problematic. Is not the group of terrorists that we are fighting in Iraq called "al Qaeda Iraq"? Did they not especially take that name (with communication directly with Zawahiri, a guy the US military cannot even find, much less communicate with, but this person, Zarqawi, with "no ties to al Qaeda" had immediate communication with him?) shortly after first attacking US troops. The troop surge has quieted the threats significantly, but before that, does anyone else remember the beheadings and frequent suicide attacks? This week, Iraqi troops took control of the volatile Anbar province. Because of the surge, we are beginning to disengage in Iraq, but no one can question why they are there. In fact, the president issued an indictment of Osama bin Laden, and the fourth point in the indictment was that he was cooperating with Saddam's Iraq especially in the development of WMD. But the president was lying, as usual. There was no link, no WMD, no terror in Iraq, the president made it up. So only one question remains:

WHY DID PRESIDENT CLINTON LIE ABOUT THIS???!!!! The indictment in question was handed down in 1998, by Janet Reno, the attorney general serving President WJB Clinton.